Archive for September 8th, 2008

Reverse Auctions in the public sector

September 8, 2008

Today I stumbled upon an article about South Korea introducing reverse auctions as a tool for public procurement.

SEOUL, Aug. 28 Asia Pulse – South Korea will introduce a reverse auction system in the public sector as part of efforts to streamline the nation’s overall procurement process and drive down purchasing costs, the Finance Ministry said Thursday.
The reverse auction is a tool mostly used in industrial procurement contracts, in which sellers compete to obtain business.
Many advanced nations such as the United States and Britain use the auction system, but experts say it may cause some unwanted side effects, such as dumping and quality problems as a result of overheating competition.
The Public Procurement Service will introduce the new auction system starting next year after revising related laws this year.
To minimize these side effects, the reverse auction will be applied only to contracts worth 190 million won (US$176,000) or less, the ministry said.
The procurement service expects the introduction of the new system to save around 20 billion won a year in purchasing costs.

Found on http://asia.news.yahoo.com/080828/4/3o94a.html

The approach of setting a contract limit to reverse auction negotiations is very similar to the public sector regulations for online auctions in Germany. It seems that in many countries the public sector is afraid of adapting this way of negotiating. The so called side effects will only appear if the auction preparation work is not done in a proper and professional manner. If all products and services are clearly defined and non price factors such as quality are taken into account when designing the auction these side effects will never take effect. I believe it’s about investing in education and preparation.

How Far Can One Take IPR Theft – The Story of How NEC Was Robbed of its Brand Name

September 8, 2008

A story in yesterdays Svenska Dagbladet regarding the widespread counterfeitting and IPR theft (in Swedish) in global trade today led me to this bizarre story starring Japanese electronics giant NEC.

In 2006, Internatial Herald Tribune (among others) reported that a fake NEC had been uncovered in China. What had started as an investigation into counterfeited keyboards and recordable  CD and DVD discs had bloated into something far bigger; and far more bizarre than anyone ever thought possible.

The counterfeiters had set up a parallel NEC with links to over 50 electronics factories in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Using the NEC brand name; even carrying NEC business cards; the counterfeit NEC copied NEC products and even went as far as developing a range of consumer products such as MP3-players, DVD players and home entertainment systems. The real NEC even got complaints that they weren’t providing warranties for the fake NEC products.

“These entities are part of a sophisticated ring… …which has attempted to completely assume the NEC brand,” said Fujio Okada, the NEC senior vice president and legal division general manager in a written statement to IHT in 2006.

Now, Chinese authorities have made great improvements in their efforts to maximize IPR protection since 2004, earlier this year the National Working Group for IPR Protection presented an Action Plan on IPR Protection 2008, deploying 280 detail measures in 10 areas. The complete plan can be studied on the Intellectual Property Protection in China web site.