Mercedes vs. BMW go head to head on two wheels

by

With the recent set-back of the automotive industry it comes as no surprise that the two German automakers Mercedes and BMW attempt to tackle new markets – albeit twin-wheeled promotional products. Both automakers have recently upgraded their promotional products with new bicycle ranges and startlingly enough there’s quite a discrepancy separation two brands offers – both from a functionality aspect as well as from a brand correlation angle.

What BMWs marketing department has in mind when it decided on a standard city cruiser model (with a little bit of MTB style thrown in for good measure) is beyond me. With a brand vision of “sheer driving pleasure” it’s rather astonishing that their venture into the realm of pedal power 2009 comes through a no-name aluminum frame complemented by the low-end Shimano Alivio group set.

The sourcing staff that stand behind this low cost approach must have forgotten (or completely ignored) the ideas of aligning corporate and purchasing strategies; the resulting bicycle is the equivalent of slapping a BMW logo on a Yugo.

The Mercedes’ bicycle range on the other hand is definitely more in line with what you’d expect from something coming out of Stuttgart: the road racing bike is delivered with a SRAM Red group set (top of the line), a set of DT Swiss 1450 Mon Chasseral wheels (the lightest wheel set of the DT Swiss RR range) on top of a no-name carbon frame (rumor says it’s a Carbotec frame but that’s not confirmed).

At 5000 Euro it isn’t exactly cheap; but lest not forget that the group set alone is 1 700 Euro and the wheel set will set you back another 1000 Euro. Add pedals, a carbon fork, head set, drop bars and there isn’t even much margin for the Mercedes brand.

Advertisement

One Response to “Mercedes vs. BMW go head to head on two wheels”

  1. e46 led Says:

    When the 1 series came out, I did not enjoy it. Perhaps if it ended up closer to what the 2002 was and was (much) lighter, more affordable, and had a really wonderful I4 (turboed or not, I do not care) then I would enjoy it greater, but whatever. What frustrated me extra was the inevitable M type that ought to rationally be titled the M1. I thought that it just wouldn’t be correct to match up the two M1s. Then again, since the 1 series first showed in the US, the M division has created 2 SUVs that don’t even come with a manual. The Porsche Cayenne has one, was it that hard? Anyways, times are changing so go on and call it an M1. Greater to deliver a good, or possibly marvelous, vehicle rather than not build it at all just due to the fact a bundle of fanboys would get hurt.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.