Archive for the ‘green procurement’ Category

The Effects of Wal-Mart’s Recent Supplier Summit in Beijing

October 24, 2008

Earlier this week; Lee Scott, president and CEO of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Mike Duke, vice chairman for Wal-Mart’s international division addressed more than 1000 of Wal-Mart’s leading suppliers, Chinese officials and NGOs at a Wal-Mart supplier conference in Beijing, China.

Lee Scott sent a crystal clear message to Wal-Mart’s Chinese supply base:

My intention here is to send a message about how serious we are. Meeting social and environmental standards is not optional… And let me say to our own associates, an environmentally and socially responsible supply chain will not be optional for Wal-mart, we will hold our own associates accountable… Make no mistake; we expect from suppliers a firm commitment to meet strict social and environmental standards; to be open to rigorous audits; and to publicly disclose all appropriate information.

He continues to state that suppliers that do not meet the standards set by Wal-Mart are expected to put forth a plan to fix the problem and those who still do not improve will be banned. Mr Scott drove his point home by saying that:

No-one should be under any illusion that moving a factory to another country will avoid accountability.

Before Mr. Scott took the stage; Mike Duke had outlined Wal-Mart’s strategic sustainability goals.

  • To build an environmentally and socially responsible supply chain.
  • To make our stores more sustainable.
  • To bring our customers products that are more sustainable; how they are made, how they are packaged and how they are used.

Wal-Mart has issued a press release detailing most of the points delivered at the summit in Beijing which can be found here. But the best thing is (although it doesn’t show the audience response); videos of both Mr. Scott’s and Mr. Duke’s speeches can be seen in the video section of the Wal-Mart corporate web site.

One can only wait and see which impact this will have on the Chinese manufacturing industry, in the last few years labor costs have gone up 70 to 100 percent, yet many factories have been able to raise their prices because companies such as Wal-Mart are saying no price increases. One indication of what might be in store was published earlier this week. The official Xinhua News Agency reported that 3,631 toy exporters — 52.7 percent of the industry’s enterprises — went out of business in 2008. The causes: higher production costs, wage increases for workers and the rising value of the yuan.

Who Wants a Green Supply Chain?

October 20, 2008

I think that all of us agree that environmental and sustainability initiatives have been front and center for many management teams in the last few years; but the question is how these inititatives will fare in the face of todays economic downturn.

A former colleague of mine used to say that green initiatives will be a non-issue in the future; I believe his view was that the market would find a common view on these issues and that the problem would solve itself, yet most reports on the issue all point in the same direction; green initiatives might be good for the planet, but as a business opportunity (or differentiator) it’s as good as a dead duck.

Take the results of the recent “2008 3PL Provider CEO Perspective” (a well researched short take on the report can be found WSJ MarketWatch. Although the 3PL industry has really taken up the gauntlet and established environmental responsibility as part of their corporate strategies few actually track any performance in the area and few (if any) of the CEO’s surveyed believe that the initiatives are significant in winning new business (or even retaining the existing customers).

But one interesting aspect of the findings is that many of the initiatives have come into focus not because the customers wanted it; instead many are primarily instigated from inside, as part of the companies corporate social responsibility initiatives.

The question is; especially in these times of economic downturn; will this trend have the perseverance to really reshape logistics (and other parts of the supply chain) or will customer demands for lower prices knock environmental issues down the corporate agenda. I; for one; hope that this will not happen and that the ethics and morality (as displayed by the urge for companies to establish CSR-agendas) will prevail over the short term goal of lower costs.

Is green procurement and CSR just empty words?

October 2, 2008

Recent reports (and interviews in the press with various management profiles) have often highlighted that companies of today are highly aware of sustainability issues and the impact that these issues may have on business in the future. For example; 74 percent of the CEO’s surveyed in PWC’s 11th Annual Global CEO Survey answered that “Developing countries should accept more responsibility and cost than developing economies for mitigating climate change”. They also cite the need to collaborate more efficiently with each other to address climate change as one way of getting to ends with the matter.

But one starts to wonder if this is just empty words.

A recent study (available here, in swedish, and based on interviews with 1 800 logistics buyers in the Nordics) from Posten Logistik – the logistics arm of the Swedish Post – pointed out that although sustainability and climate change is ranked high on the agenda for top level executives, few logistics buyers would accept a rise in logistics costs or prolonged delivery time.

According to the survey:

  • 53 percent of the logistics buyers would not exchange their current means of transportation if it would mean a 10 percent increase in cost.
  • 54 percent of the logistics buyers would not exchange their current means of transportation if it would mean an increased time of delivery of 24 hours.

The report concludes that there is little room for sustainability issues in today’s logistics market since the competitive edge for many companies is tightly bound to the cost and efficiency of distribution.

Yet many sustainability reports point out that logistics and packaging are areas frequently targeted by companies who have succeeded with their CSR and sustainability agendas.

So one has to wonder; are company leaders saying one thing to the press and another to their employees? Or has the economic downturn in reality (and unfortunately) made sustainability initiatives obsolete.

Another Look at the Drivers Behind Green Procurement

September 2, 2008

My post from last week regarding green procurement (be sure to check the links in the comments as well) and where to start got me digging a little deeper into the realities of green procurement and the how’s and why’s of sustainability issues. While the research available tells only parts of the story; most distinctly indicate where the trends are going.

Industry Week recently ran a piece on the subject authored by Chris Ferrell, Associate Director of the Supply Chain Consortium (who also provided the data for the analysis) and the findings quite neatly match those published in the Global Supply Chain Trends 2008-2010 report which we highlighted a few days ago.

One of the findings was that even though environmental sustainability is considered to be a key factor in future globalization strategies regulatory compliance and customer requirements are ranked higher than more cost driven factors such as differentiation and optimized logistics/processes.

That said; regulations and requirements vary by industry, with electronics and consumer goods more likely to face these requirements than other industries. The approaches to complying with these requirements vary as well, but it’s clear that involving the partners and suppliers in your supply chain is the path that most companies follow; in addition to looking for traditional supply chain efficiencies which carry environmental benefits (such as packaging and transportations).

From my point of view, environmental sustainability is an issue that affects us all which in it self justifies that collaboration is the key to greening your procurement.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.